
Injecting Diogoxin into this
22-week-old baby's heart prevents a live birth and lets the
abortion 'move along a little easier'
Q.
What percentage of time are you successful in getting the
Digoxin into the fetal heart?
A.
I would say approximately 50 percent.
Q.
And what about the term "living fetus," what does that mean to
you?
A.
It would be a fetus that still has a heartbeat, and that would
still apply to many of my cases.
Q.
And in your practice do you bring the fetus to the point where
the fetal trunk past the navel is outside the body of the woman?
A.
Yes, I do. That's what I mainly do.
Q.
And that happens often?
A.
Yes.
~
Q.
You testified yesterday, I believe, that you have performed
approximately 30,000 surgical abortions throughout your career?
A.
That is my best guess.
Excerpts from the Government's cross-examination Dr. Sheehan:
Q.
Thank you. If I could read that to you, page 101 [of Dr.
Sheehan’s deposition], starting on line 22.and I should say
first this question refers to your expert report; is that
correct?
A.
Uh-huh.
Q.
“Question: Could you describe, doctor, what you mean in
paragraph 4 by your ‘best efforts to remove the fetus intact?
Answer: I think I already described that, but what I attempt to
do is to grasp the fetal feet with the instrument, and putting
gentle traction on that fetal extremity, I try to tease the
tissue down so that the fetus comes down feet first through the
cervix, the pelvis and the thorax, and I actually get the arms
out and just use gentle traction, rather than using the kind of
crushing and compressing gestures that one would use to do the
disarticulation.”
Is
that what you said?
A.
Yes.
Excerpts from direct examination of Dr. Eleanor Drey:
Q.
And was there a time frame of when [Digoxin] was given?
A.
When we first started giving it, we always gave it at the time
that we were doing our preoperative evaluation, so that the
patient would get the laminaria placed. And then, after that,
she would have the Digoxin injection. At that time we were
waiting two days with the laminaria in place. And, so, initially
we were giving Digoxin two days before D&E.
Q.
And did you ever change that procedure, that time schedule?
A.
We did. What started happening was we had an unfortunate number
of women who were spontaneously going into labor and delivering
at hospitals sort of all over the bay area, and it was
distressing to everyone.
DAY THREE: Thursday, April 1, 2004:
Excerpts from direct examination of Dr. "Doe" (testifying under
a pseudonym):
Q.
Do some women deliver the fetus partially as a result of the
misoprostol?
A.Yes, they can.
Q.
And when that happens, could the fetus be outside the uterus
past the navel of the fetus?
A.
Outside the uterus, yes, and potentially even outside the
vagina.
Q..
And could it be alive?
A.
Yes.
[He just admitted that babies are sometimes born alive]
Q..
And when that happens, how do you complete the procedure?
A.
Usually, if the fetus is coming out, the easiest method is to
try to do how we would do a breech. It often comes out in a
breech presentation. And, again, that is feet first, head
second. We do the similar maneuvers that we would do to do a
breech delivery. However, sometimes the cervix is not dilated
enough to allow the calvarium [head] to pass.
Q.
And what do you then do?
A.
I would separate the calvarium [head] from the body.

~
Q.
And when during in induction does fetal demise occur; do you
know?
A.
I don’t know. It really depends on gestational age, and
sometimes the fetus is born alive.
~
Q.
And do you ever -- do patients ever ask you whether there is
something they could use to cause fetal demise?
A.
Yes. I would -- I don’t know what percentage of my patients, but
a certainly small number of patients ask could there be fetal
demise prior to the procedure. When I talk to them about what it
would entail to do, most of them do not want to proceed with
that. And I don’t think they are particularly worried about the
effects. They don’t think -- I think about the infection risk.
They don’t think about the infection risk. They just don’t want
to go through that procedure, to have a needle placed, and under
ultrasound guidance maybe see the ultrasound and see the fetus
again. The vast majority of the patients don’t want to have that
done.
Excerpts from cross-examination of Dr. "Doe":
Q.
And I think you testified earlier that in about 15 percent of
the D&Es you perform, the fetus is delivered partially intact so
that the calvarium gets stuck in the cervix; is that correct?
A.
It was – I think my testimony, I believe, is approximately 15
percent would be delivered intact. Not all of those that the
calvarium would be stuck; some would deliver completely intact.
Q.
Do you have a -- can you give me an estimate of that 15 percent
how many are delivered where the calvarium does get stuck in the
cervix?
A.
I would probably say at least 80 percent the calvarium would be
stuck in the cervix.
Q.
And just to be clear, the calvarium, again, is just the fetus’
head, correct?
A.
Correct.
Q.
In those cases in which you are doing a D&E and the fetus
delivers partially intact except for the calvarium getting stuck
in the cervix, you have to insert forceps and crush the
calvarium; is that right?
A.
I would separate the calvarium from the fetal -- how I would
perform the procedure is, I would separate the calvarium from
the fetal body, thorax, and then insert the forceps to crush the
calvarium to be able to deliver it.
~
Q.
Let me just ask you. Can you describe for us how you get the
forceps around the calvarium before crushing it?
A.
In a situation where the fetus is delivered up until the
calvarium?
Q.
That’s right.
A.
Again, as I testified, I would separate the calvarium from the
fetus, so --
Q.
Let me stop you right there. How would you separate the
calvarium from the fetus?
A.
Under direct visualization, I would use, seeing outside of the
cervix within the vagina that I can see directly, I would use
scissors to cut the neck and separate the -- I am not in the
uterus, I am in the vagina, separating the fetal calvarium from
the fetal body.

Dr. Doe would kill a baby like
this (24 weeks) by cutting the head from the body
Q.
And after you’ve done that, the calvarium is still in the
cervix?
A.
Or in the lower uterine segment.
Q.
Okay. Then what is the next step that you do?
A.
The next step I would use is to put the bierer forceps -- is
what I most likely would be using in the situation – into the
uterus, get around, open them wide, get around the calvarium,
and crush the calvarium. Just as if it were higher up and not
stuck in the cervix, I would be doing it just the same way.
Q.
And is it fair to say that the calvarium is one of the largest
parts of the fetus?
A.
Yes.
Q.
It is also one of the widest parts of the fetus?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Is it fair to say that when you are opening the forceps to get
around the calvarium, you are opening them wider than you would
if you were attempting to grasp a fetal limb?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Could there potentially be risks to the cervix when you are
opening the forceps wide enough to get around the calvarium?
A.
Yes.
Q.
In fact, one of those risks might be a perforation or a
laceration of the cervix, right?
A.
Yes.
Q.
And another risk might be a perforation or a laceration of the
lower uterine segment?
A.
Yes.
Q.
And let’s talk about that a little bit. Are the -- can the bones
of the calvarium, can they be sharp?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Are they in any -- are they sharper say than the bones of the
fetal leg or are they roughly comparable?
A.
It depends on how -- if it’s a disarticulation of how it went. A
calvarium could be crushed and there are not sharp edges and the
femur, which is a leg bone, could be broken and be sharper. I
think you can’t predict that. But I think any of the major long
bones, certainly not ribs, but femur, humorous could be sharper
than a calvarium that has been crushed.
Q.
And when you are crushing the calvarium, there is the same risks
that we talked about earlier, possible perforation or laceration
of the cervix, the lower uterine segment, or the uterus; is that
right?
A.
Yes.
Q.
And a cervical or uterine laceration, it can be relatively minor
or it could be relatively severe; is that right?
A.
Yes.
Q.
If it’s severe enough, there are some cases where a woman might
exsanguinate and die, right?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Can you tell us what exsanguinate means?
A.
To bleed to death.
Excerpts from re-cross examination of Dr. "Doe":
Q.
And Ms. Parker asked you a question about why some of your
patients don’t prefer a labor induction abortion. I think one of
the reasons you gave was that your -- the woman may not want to
see the fetus; is that right?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Now, in a labor induction abortion you are not showing the fetus
to the mother in every case, are you?
A.
No, we are not. But with a labor induction, it is often kind of
unpredictable when the fetus delivers. And it is probably a
minority of times the physician is actually there at the time to
deliver the fetus. Often you don’t have the normal kind of
cervical dilation that you might have in a term labor. You have
nothing, nothing, nothing. And then, all of a sudden, she goes:
"I have got to push," and the fetus kind of pops into the bed.
DAY FOUR: Monday, April 5, 2004.
Excerpts from cross- examination of Dr. Fredrik Broekhuizen:
Q.
Usually in examining the fetal parts you don’t actually see the
bones, do you? You usually see the limb and the actual bone is
in the limb?
A.
You can sometimes see bone. Sometimes you can see just the limb.
Q.
But usually you just see the limb, and the actual bone is in the
limb?
A.
Actually, when disarticulation takes place in the joint one can
certainly see the end of the bone on inspection.
Q.
The end of the bone. But usually the rest of the bone is inside
the limb?
A. There are situations where
actually the bone is crushed in the middle of the limb. And
under those circumstances one can see part of the bone.
~
Q.
Doctor, you testified earlier that sometimes parents want an
intact fetus for blessing or burial. Have you ever had the
parent express that desire where you had compressed the head of
the fetus to complete the delivery?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Was anything done in those instances, doctor, to improve the
appearance of the fetus’ head after decompression?
A.
Yes.
Q.
What was done?
A.
The fetus was -- just like a newborn -- it was dressed and kind
of had a little hat placed on it so that only the face was
visible.

From Dr. Tiller's facility in
Wichita, Kansas: A father, mother, and aborted child- note
misshapen head

Q.
You have seen the fetus’ legs move before crushing the head,
haven’t you?
A.
I have seen that before compressing/decompressing the head.
Q.
And that is while the head is lodged in the internal os?
A.
Correct.
Q.
The rest of the body is outside the cervix?
A.
Correct.
Excerpts from direct examination of Dr. Mitchell Creinin:
Q.
If that happens and you remove the dilators and you find you
have more than two, two and a half centimeters, is that a bad
outcome?
A.
No. … I want -- I judge the number of Dilapan based on making
sure I get the minimum amount without putting in so many that I
make her uncomfortable or get more dilation than I absolutely
need, which I have found at times can cause patients to go into
labor or deliver.
~
Q.
What do you do to evacuate the contents of the uterus?
A..
. . If it is head first, it’s very, very, very difficult to try
and grasp the head as the very first thing. So, with every D&E,
the way I have been taught, the way I have always done it, the
way I have always taught it is to try and grab a lower limb to
convert the position to breech and then proceed with the
evacuation. If it’s already breech, or if it’s transverse,
that’s easier to grab a lower extremity. After grabbing the
lower extremity, I am going to pull the pregnancy or pull
whatever part I have grasped through the open cervix until there
is resistance from the lower uterine segment and the internal os.
My goal is to try and remove the fetus as intact as possible.
The fewer passes, the safer it is for the woman. So, as I pull
down, the uterus is going to tell me how far I can go just by
the resistance I get. So when I meet resistance, I will continue
to pull, and it’s the pressure of the fetus against the lower
uterine segment that actually results in dismemberment of the
fetus. And where that is going to happen on the fetus will vary
from patient to patient.
|
Q. So, moving along, once you’ve located and grasped the
lower extremities and turn the fetus if you need to,
what do you do next?
A. Pull with the instrument that I am using to remove
the fetus with the attempt to remove the fetus in as few
passes as possible. So until I meet resistance from the
lower uterine segment, I will continue to pull.
Q. Why --
A. And once I meet resistance, I will then, while
holding on to the fetus -- minimal rotation, but just
kind of try and ease those parts through the cervix to
allow whatever’s meeting resistance to try and slowly
get through the cervix. The fetus will either continue
to come or will begin to break apart. It will break
apart wherever or whatever it is. It may be in the
middle of the leg, it may be at the abdomen, it may be
at the chest, just depending on the dilation and the
size of the fetus, et cetera, just on that individual
case.
~

Q. Does it ever happen that in grasping the fetus you’re
able to remove the fetus intact or relatively intact all
the way up to the calvarium?
A. Yes, on occasion.
Q. If that happens, would you do anything differently to
complete the procedure?
A. If the fetus is intact up to the calvarium, there’s
two things I could do. One would be to continue to pull,
and usually it comes apart at the level of the neck, or
I can insert, what I would I have done is insert
scissors through that part of the head under direct
visualization, inserted the 11-millimeter cannula that I
used before and drain the brain tissue and then the head
comes through the opening.
DAY FIVE: Tuesday, April 6, 2004
Excerpts from Government’s cross-examination of Dr.
Mitchell Creinin:
Q. Now, you have encountered situations in which you are
performing a D&E and the fetus is removed intact except
that the head of the fetus gets stuck at the internal
cervical os, correct?
A. Correct.
Q. When that has happened you have proceeded with the
D&E procedure in one of three ways, correct?
A. If you can tell me the three ways I would be happy
to.
Q. One method would be to pull on the baby so that the
head breaks off from the rest of the body; is that
right?
A. Yes.
Q. And then, you will go inside the uterus with the
forceps and remove the head?
A. Correct.
Q. The next method is that you would use scissors to
puncture the base of the skull?
A. Correct.
Q. And the, you will stick a suction cannula into the
opening and drain the brain tissue, and then you will
have the head come out.
A. Did you say “Drain the brain tissue”?
Q. Then, you will drain the brain tissue?
A. Yes.
~

In a D&E abortion, the
head is sometimes crushed after draining the brain
Q. And the third method is that you take a crushing
instrument, put that instrument inside the cervical os,
crush the baby’s head, and pull the head through the
cervix, correct?
A. That would be the third possible, although physically
that would virtually never be the case. It would be one
of the first two. Those are my three options, but it
would be one of the first two that I could realistically
do.
~
Q. Doctor, if a woman’s cervix was so dilated the fetus
could be delivered in intact it would not be necessary
to collapse the skull because the fetus could pass
through the cervix, right?
A. Correct.
Q. But you would not allow the fetus to pass intact if
the fetus were at or about 24 weeks in gestation,
correct?
A. Correct.
Q. Because if the fetus were close to 24 weeks, and you
were performing a transvaginal surgical abortion you
would be concerned about delivering the fetus entirely
intact because that might result in a live baby that may
survive, correct?
A. You said I was performing an abortion, so since the
objective of the abortion is to not have a live fetus,
then that would be correct.
Q. In your opinion, if you were performing a surgical
abortion at 23 or 24 weeks and the cervix was so dilated
that the head could pass without compression, you would
do whatever you needed to do in order to make sure that
the live baby was not delivered, wouldn’t you?
A. Whatever I needed, meaning whatever surgical
procedures I needed to do as part of the procedure? Yes.
Then, the answer would be: Yes.
Q. And one step you would take to avoid delivery of a
live baby would to be to deliver or hold the fetus’ head
on the internal side of the cervical os in order to
collapse the skull; is that right?
A. Yes, because the objective of my procedure is to
perform an abortion.
Q. And that would ensure that you did not deliver a live
baby?
A. Correct.
[the only thing preventing a live birth in these
instances is the interference of the doctor, who is
killing the baby instead of delivering him]
Excerpts from Planned Parenthood's re-direct examination
of Dr. Creinin:
The witness: There have been situations, most commonly
if there is a multiple pregnancy and the first one is
removed by D&E, and then the second one because the
cervix is very pliable at that point will come out
completely intact.
The Court: Have you had that experience?
The Witness: Yes. In all of those situations, though
regardless of whether the fetus comes out completely
intact, intact up to the head, and I do a procedure on
the base of the skull, or I did – or it comes out
completely at the level of the head, and I disarticulate
it, all of those have at times gone intact or relatively
intact to the level of the umbilicus or greater and
would violate the law.
Excerpts from Planned Parenthood's direct examination of
Dr. Carolyn Westhoff:
Q. And in what way does it – looking at the reduction in
the risk of injuring the woman with the sharp, boney
fragments, if you can explain in a little more detail
how that happens?
A. Well, I need to explain that by contrasting it to a
D&E that involves disarticulating the fetus. When the
fetus is disarticulated, the skin and soft tissue
covering the bones is disrupted, so sharp fragments of
bone are exposed. And in the process of exposing them,
grasping them, and removing them from the uterus there
is the possibility that those boney fragments can
lacerate at any level of the uterus and the cervix
itself during extraction.
~
Q. Can the boney parts perforate the uterus in addition
to lacerating it?
A. Yes, they can.
Q. Have you ever observed uterine perforation or
laceration or cervical laceration as a result of
instrument passes in a D&E with disarticulation?
A. Yes.
Q. Have you ever observed that happening as a result of
sharp fetal parts?
A. Yes, I have.
~
Q. Is there an advantage to intact D&E in terms of not
having retained tissue in the uterus after the
procedure?
A. Yes, there is.
Q. What is the – what is that – can you explain that
advantage in a little more detail?
A. Yes. When the fetus is removed in parts we attempt to
account for all the parts on the operating table at the
completion of the case. But it is entirely possible that
small fragments of soft tissue can remain inside the
uterus that we can’t be sure of. And even with, for
instance, the sonographic scan, we may not be able to
detect those, and that can lead to subsequent infection
or hemorrhage on the part of the patient. We have, in
fact, on our service had a case with a small fragment of
retained skull leading to those very difficulties and
requiring a second procedure subsequently to relieve
those symptoms.
~
A. … In contrast, when I am retrieving a fetal skull
that is floating fee in the uterine cavity, I must pass
instruments in an attempt to grasp it inside the uterus.
And that is a blind use of instruments, which has more
potential for perforation.
~
Q. And once you start the procedure with instruments, do
you complete it with instruments? Or might you bring out
a presenting part with an instrument, and then switch to
your fingers?
A. Yes. Each procedure proceeds very individually, and
so each step of the procedure will depend really on just
what happened in the one step before it. And for each
step of the procedure I want to do what is going to be
safest at that moment. So, yes, in fact, I have had
cases where I may bring down and extract a leg with an
instrument and disarticulate that leg, but because the
position of the fetus comes down in the uterus during
that maneuver, I may then be able to bring down the next
leg with my fingers. And, in fact, the rest of the fetus
will follow. So, similarly, I could start with my
fingers and then in addition need to use instruments. So
the combination of maneuvers I use are determined one at
a time on an individual basis to minimize the total
number of passes and maximize patient safety at each
step of the way.
DAY SEVEN: Friday, April 9, 2004
Excerpts from Government’s direct examination of Dr. M.
Leroy Sprang:
Q. . . . Now, could you tell us, please, why it is your
opinion that intact D&X presents a risk of infection?
A. Several reasons. One, that
normally in the vagina, just like on the skin in the
mouth we have numerous bacteria present. But
particularly in the vagina there are generally five to
nine organisms that occur in very large numbers, like 10
to the ninth. And that is where they belong, and they
don’t do any harm there. If you add a foreign body,
twigs, stick seaweed, you are going a get a certain
amount of trauma to the tissue which enhances the
bacterial growth. And the way the laminaria work, their
length is such that you are taking them from the outside
of the vagina, placing them through the cervical canal.
For them to be effective, they have to cover the entire
length of the cervical canal with a portion of them
remaining in the vagina so you can retrieve them, and
the other portion going right up against the amniotic
sac. If you don’t do that, you are not going to
completely dilate the cervix the entire length, and it
will lead to major problems. So what happens in the
first day, a certain amount of
trauma from the little sticks, as
they dilate, even more trauma. But then the bacteria in
the vagina work their way up those little sticks and are
then at the level of the internal os and sitting right
next to the amniotic sac. So that it is moving them from
the normal position to an abnormal position, which
increases the risk of infection.
Q. Does the length of time over which the dilation for
intact D&X occurs, do you think that also increases the
risk of infection?
A. It increases the risk because the length of time a
foreign body is there, the greater the risk of bringing
bacteria from the vagina to the cervix, either on the
first application or on the subsequent applications of
the laminaria. Sometimes the actual little sticks will
break the amniotic sac, too, which significantly
increases the risk of infection because then you have
the bacteria going from the vagina to the uterine
cavity. And I know that happens just obviously
intuitively it happens, but the different authors,
including Haskell, describes it in his paper that
sometimes it breaks and sometimes it doesn’t. And the
next day when they remove them and proceed to the next
step of the procedure, if it has -- his comment is “if
it hasn’t already ruptured,” which obviously tells you
sometimes it does, then he ruptures the membranes. So
you have another significant risk of infection there,
especially if it broke. You inserted them on day two,
and you waited to day three to do the procedure, you’ve
got a ruptured bag of waters with foreign bodies sitting
in the cervix for potentially 24 hours.
Q. Doctor, you said something a few minutes ago about
the amount of bacteria in the vagina. What I think you
said was: “10 to the ninth”?
A. Yes. It is a mathematical term.
And you add 10, and add nine zeros. That is the number.
Q. Doctor, I think you also mentioned the internal
podalic version as presenting a risk to the patient. Why
is it your opinion that that maneuver presents a risk to
the patient?
A. Having done it as well, there is a strong mechanical
force in taking the fetus and basically forcing it to do
a summersault within the uterine cavity. These are not
little things that you just kind of push gently, and it
just turns. It doesn’t work that way. You are using a
great deal of force in turning it upside-down that does
trauma to the uterine cavity and could disrupt the
placenta and cause bleeding. And rarely things like
amniotic fluid embolus. Those are not common things that
could happen, but rarely they could. And, in fact, in
Williams’ textbook of obstetrics, which is one of the
most premiere, respected obstetrical textbooks for
teaching medical students, when I was a student was the
primary textbook, it specifically says that there are
very few, if any, indications to do internal podalic
version other than the second twin. And in various
editions he actually says it is potentially harmful. He
says that it is the most common cause of traumatic
uterine rupture.
Q. Doctor, if I can ask a few follow-up questions on
those things. You mentioned disrupting -- the potential
for disrupting the placenta. What can that lead to?
A. Again, these are rare situations, but there is
potential trauma if you disrupt the placenta at that
point. There will be bleeding. And you are also -- you
have got vernix parts, white stuff on the fetus. There
is not as much that early in pregnancy. You have still
got some amniotic fluid around. When you disrupt the
placenta, some of that material can get into the
maternal circulation, which could cause an amniotic
fluid embolism in the mother, which is a very serious
situation.
Q. Is there any risk in that internal podalic version of
causing maternal bleeding?
A. Because if you do separate the placenta, all the
blood supply to the uterus goes to the surface of the
placenta and stops there. If the placenta starts to
separate, you, in fact, have an abruption of a placenta,
and there would be internal hemorrhage.
~
Q. So you have never encountered a situation where the
pregnancy had to be terminated before viability because
of a maternal health condition?
A. I have not.
~
Q. Doctor, are you aware of any maternal health
conditions that would require terminating pregnancy by
the intact D&X method?
A. And after careful review and after sitting on both
the ACOG -- correction -- AMA task force, we could not
find any medical conditions that would require an intact
D&X. The ACOG panel could not come up with any
situations that would require an intact D&X. And, in
fact, in reading each of the numerous declarations and
depositions I haven’t seen any physician [here a hearsay
objection was sustained]
Q. Doctor, in your practice have you seen a need for the
use of the intact D&X method?
A. I have never seen a situation where an intact D&X
method was necessary to be performed.
My other articles and writings
|
~